vestihИзвестия Национальной академии наук Беларуси. Серия гуманитарных наукProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Humanitarian Series2524-23692524-2377The Republican Unitary Enterprise Publishing House "Belaruskaya Navuka"10.29235/2524-2369-2022-67-4-365-372vestih-935Research ArticleФИЛОСОФИЯ И СОЦИОЛОГИЯPHILOSOPHY AND SOCIOLOGYТипологические особенности религиозности в условиях современного поликонфессионального общества в БеларусиTypological features of religiosity in the conditions of modern polyconfessional society in BelarusШкуроваЕ. В.ShkurovaA. V.

Шкурова Елена Валерьевна – кандидат социологических наук, доцент, заведующий центром

ул. Сурганова, 1, корп. 2, 220072, Минск 

Elena V. Shkurova – Ph. D. (Sociol.), Associate Professor, Head of the Center

1 Surganov Str., Bldg 2, Minsk 220072

vogel_82@mail.ruИнститут социологии Национальной академии наук БеларусиInstitute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus202202112022674365372Copyright © Шкурова Е.В., 20222022Шкурова Е.В.Shkurova A.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://vestihum.belnauka.by/jour/article/view/935

Одной из ключевых задач современного религиоведения является осмысление феномена религиозности как отражения религии, которое претерпевает заметные трансформации. Динамика восприятия религии, которое в современных реалиях смещается в поле не только религиозных традиций, требует поиска механизмов осмысления религиозного опыта, релевантных потребностям социальных субъектов. Конфессиональная среда Беларуси характеризуется относительной устойчивостью, в условиях которой динамика религиозности осуществляется преимущественно в сфере качественных трансформаций. Применение многомерного кросс-конфессионального подхода к изучению религиозности обеспечивает возможность ее типологии, отражающей специфику этих трансформаций в условиях поликонфессионального общества. Таким образом, в религиозном поле Беларуси религия выполняет в основном нормативную и мировоззренчески ориентирующую функции.

One of the key tasks of modern religious studies is to comprehend the phenomenon of religiosity as a reflectionof religion, which is undergoing noticeable transformations. The dynamics of religion perception, which in modern realitiesis shifting to the field not only of religious traditions, requires the search for mechanisms for comprehending religious experience that are relevant to the needs of social subjects. The confessional environment of Belarus is characterized by relativestability, in which the dynamics of religiosity occurs mainly in the sphere of qualitative transformations. The applicationof a multidimensional cross-confessional approach to the study of religiosity provides the possibility of its typology, reflectingthe specifics of these transformations in a multi-confessional society. In this connection, it can be judged that in the religiousfield of Belarus, religion performs mainly normative and ideologically orienting functions.

религиярелигиозностьтрансформация религиозноститипология религиозностимногомерный кросс-конфессиональный подходreligionreligiositytransformation of religiositytypology of religiositymultidimensional cross-confessional approachReferencesBellah, R. N. Varieties of civil religion / R. N. Bellah, Ph. E. Hammond. – New York : Harper & Row, 1980. – 208 p.Bellah R., Hammond Ph. Varieties of civil religion. New York, Harper & Row, 1980. 208 p.Casanova, J. Public religions in the modern world / J. Casanova. – Chicago ; London : Univ. of Chicago Press, 1994. – 320 p. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226190204.001.0001Casanova J. Public religions in the modern world. Chicago, London, University of Chicago Press, 1994. 320 p. https:// doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226190204.001.0001Stowers, S. The Concepts of ‘Religion’, ‘Political Religion’ and the Study of Nazism / S. Stowers // J. of Contemporary History. – 2007. – Vol. 42, N 1. – P. 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022009407071628Stowers S. The concepts of ‘Religion’, ‘Political Religion’ and the Study of Nazism. Journal of Contemporary History, 2007, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022009407071628García, M. T. Eight contemporary catholic popular religiosity and U.S. latinos. Expressions of faith and ethnicity / M. T. García // Católicos: resistance and affirmation in Chicano catholic history / M. T. García. – Austin, 2008. – P. 251–276. https://doi.org/10.7560/718401-010García M. T. Eight contemporary catholic popular religiosity and U.S. latinos. Expressions of faith and ethnicity. Católicos: resistance and affirmation in Chicano catholic history. Austin, 2008, pp. 251–276. https://doi.org/10.7560/718401-010Shams, A. Religiosity and women’s access to higher education in the Islamic Republic of Iran / A. Shams // J. of Middle East Women’s Studies. – 2016. – Vol. 12, N 1. – P. 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1215/15525864-3422633Shams A. Religiosity and women’s access to higher education in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, 2016, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1215/15525864-3422633Михельсон, О. К. От «псевдорелигии» и «квазирелигии» к «имплицитной религии». Теологизм в исследованиях современной религиозности / О. К. Михельсон // Вестн. Орл. гос. ун-та. Сер.: Новые гуманитар. исслед. – 2014. – № 6 (41). – С. 255–258.Mikhelson O. K. From “pseudo-religion” and “quasi-religion” to “implicit religion”. Theologism in the studies of modern religiosity. Vestnik Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Novye gumanitarnye issledovaniya = Bulletin of Orel State University. Series: New Humanitarian Research, 2014, no. 6 (41), pp. 255–258 (in Russian).Колкунова, К. А. Концепции квазирелигий в современном зарубежном религиоведении : автореф. дис. … канд. филос. наук : 09.00.14 / К. А. Колкунова ; Моск. гос. ун-т им. М. В. Ломоносова. – М., 2013. – 22 с.Kolkunova K. A. Concepts of quasi-religions in modern foreign religious studies. Abstract of Ph.D. diss. Moscow, 2013. 22 p. (in Russian).Бергер, П. Социальное конструирование реальности. Трактат по социологии знания / П. Бергер, Т. Лукман. – М. : Медиум, 1995. – 323 с.Berger P., Luckmann T. The social construction of reality. A treatise on sociology of knowledge. New York, Anchor Books, 1966. 219 p.Luckmann, T. The invisible religion: the problem of religion in modern society / T. Luckmann. – New York : Macmillan, 1967. – 128 p.Luckmann T. The Invisible religion: the problem of religion in modern society. New York, Macmillan Publ., 1967. 128 p.Eckhardt, W. Cross-cultural religiosity / W. Eckhardt // Peace Research. – 1970. – Vol. 2, N 9. – P. 19–20.Eckhardt W. Cross-cultural religiosity. Peace Research, 1970, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 19–20.Shepherd, W. C. On the concept of «Being Wrong» religiously / W. C. Shepherd // J. of the Amer. Acad. of Religion. – 1974. – Vol. 42, N 1. – P. 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/xlii.1.66Shepherd W. C. On the concept of “Being Wrong” religiously. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 1974, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/xlii.1.66Kliever, L. D. Polysymbolism and modern religiosity / L. D. Kliever // The J. of Religion. – 1979. – Vol. 59, N 2. – P. 169–194. https://doi.org/10.1086/486684Kliever L. D. Polysymbolism and modern religiosity. The Journal of Religion, 1979, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 169–194. https://doi.org/10.1086/486684Tamney, J. B. Consequential religiosity in modern society / J. B. Tamney, S. D. Johnson // Rev. of Religious Research. – 1985. – Vol. 26, N 4. – P. 360–378. https://doi.org/10.2307/3511050Tamney J. B., Johnson S. D. Consequential religiosity in modern society. Review of Religious Research, 1985, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 360–378. https://doi.org/10.2307/3511050Hervieu-Léger, D. Individualism, the Validation of Faith, and the Social Nature of Religion in Modernity / D. HervieuLéger // The Blackwell companion to sociology of religion / ed. R. K. Fenn. – Oxford ; Malden, 2003. – P. 161–175. https://doi. org/10.1002/9780470998571.ch9Hervieu-Léger D. Individualism, the validation of faith, and the social nature of religion in modernity. The Blackwell companion to sociology of religion. Oxford, Malden, 2003, pp. 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470998571.ch9Михельсон, О. К. Сакрализация популярного. Методологические подходы к исследованию religion-like phenomena в современном религиоведении / О. К. Михельсон // Вестн. С.-Петерб. ун-та. Философия и конфликтология. – 2018. – Т. 34, вып. 1. – С. 122–137. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2018.112Mikhelson O. K. Sacralization of the popular. Methodological approaches to religion-like phenomena in contemporary religious studies. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Filosofiya i konfliktologiya = Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2018, vol. 34, iss. 1, pp. 122–137 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/ spbu17.2018.112Sørensen J. Religion in сonsciousness: a review article on cognitive religion. ReligioPolis [Electronic resource]. – Mode of access: http://www.religiopolis.org/religiovedenie/6186-kognitivnoe-religiovedenie-sp-11388.html. – Date of access: 30.05.2019.Sørensen J. Religion in сonsciousness: a review article on cognitive religion. ReligioPolis. Available at: http://www. religiopolis.org/religiovedenie/6186-kognitivnoe-religiovedenie-sp-11388.html/ (accessed 30.05.2019) (in Russian).Sørensen, J. Religion in mind: a review article of the cognitive science of religion / J. Sørensen // Numen. – 2005. – Vol. 52, N 4. – P. 465–494. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852705775219974Sørensen J. Religion in mind: a review article of the cognitive science of religion. Numen, 2005, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 465–494. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852705775219974Possamaï, A. Religion and popular culture: a hyper-real testament / А. Possamaï. – Brussels : PIE-Peter Lang, 2005. – 176 p.Possamaï A. Religion and popular culture: a hyper-real testament. Brussels, PIE-Peter Lang, 2005. 176 p.Beyer, P. From atheism to open religiosity: Muslim men / P. Beyer // Growing Up Canadian: Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists / ed.: Р. Beyer, R. Ramji. – Canada, 2013. – Р. 74–111.Beyer P. From atheism to open religiosity: Muslim men. Growing Up Canadian: Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists. Canada, 2013, pp. 74–111.Uibu, M. Religiosity as a cultural toolbox: a study of Estonian new spirituality / M. Uibu. – Tartu : Univ. of Tartu Press, 2016. – 258 p. – (Dissertationes Theologiae Univesitatis Tartuensis ; 32).Uibu M. Religiosity as a cultural toolbox: a study of Estonian new spirituality. Dissertationes Theologiae Univesitatis Tartuensis; 32. Tartu, University of Tartu Press, 2016. 258 p.Mathews, G. Global culture/individual identity: searching for home in the cultural supermarket / G. Mathews. – London ; New York : Routledge, 2000. – 228 p.Mathews G. Global culture/individual identity: searching for home in the cultural supermarket. London, New York, Routledge, 2000. 228 p.Paxton, P. Volunteering and the dimensions of religiosity: a cross-national analysis / P. Paxton, N. E. Reith, J. L. Glanville // Rev. of Religious Research. – 2014. – Vol. 56, N 4. – P. 597–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-014-0169-yPaxton P., Reith N. E., Glanville J. L. Volunteering and the dimensions of religiosity: a cross-national analysis. Review of Religious Research, 2014, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 597–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-014-0169-ySchnabel, L. Gendered religiosity / L. Schnabel // Rev. of Religious Research. – 2017. – Vol. 59, N 4. – P. 547–556. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s13644-017-0302-9Schnabel L. Gendered religiosity. Review of Religious Research, 2017, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 547–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s13644-017-0302-9Gul, F. A. Auditee religiosity, external monitoring, and the pricing of audit services / F. A. Gul, A. C. Ng // J. of Business Ethics. – 2018. – Vol. 152, N 2. – P. 409–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3284-6Gul F. A., Ng A. C. Auditee religiosity, external monitoring, and the pricing of audit services. Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, vol. 152, no. 2, pp. 409–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3284-6Goshadze, M. In chase of ‘Modern religiosity’ / M. Goshadze // J. of Religion in Europe. – 2021. – Vol. 14, N 3–4. – P. 246–271. https://doi.org/10.1163/18748929-bja10057Goshadze M. In chase of ‘Modern Religiosity’. Journal of Religion in Europe, 2021, vol. 14, no. 3–4, pp. 246–271. https://doi.org/10.1163/18748929-bja10057

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.