On the issue of paradigmatic interdependence of contact and areal linguistics

The article presents the theoretical foundations of the paradigmatic interdependence of contact and areal linguistics. The experience of scientific understanding of the spatial approach to the study of various aspects of language contact allows us to identify a tendency towards universalization of the conceptual apparatus of contact linguistics, as well as the correlation of the latter with the areal interpretation of the dialect landscape. It is emphasized that in the hierarchy of disciplines involved in the analysis of the processes and results of linguistic interaction, contact linguistics occupies a higher position. In this regard, the feasibility of integrating individual terms of this subject area into the categorical plane of areal linguistics is substantiated: the multifunctionality of the basic unit of contact linguistics – contacteme – makes it possible, firstly, to more objectively and accurately qualify complex areal phenomena (for example, when the stimulus for the emergence of innovation emanating from the source language is not equivalent to the result in the destination language), secondly, do not narrow the problem of language contacts to the issue of borrowings and bilingualism. Special attention is paid to the peculiarities of the terminological system of the described scientific fields. A number of issues are considered regarding the definition of the linguistic essence of the key concepts “contact zone”, “borrowing”, “infiltration”, etc. It is established that the term “contact zone” has conceptual significance not only for arealological studies, in a broader context it is included in the system concepts of contactology.

1. Tsykhun G. A. Some problems of contact linguistics (regarding the term and concept of “contact zone”). Language space. Linguistic ties. History of words: selected works. Minsk, 2018, pp. 167-171 (in Belarusian).

2. Tsykhun G. A. Areal typology of Slavic languages: principles and directions of research. Selected works: Belarusian studies, Slavic studies, areal linguistics. Minsk, 2012, pp. 39-66 (in Belarusian).

3. Sudnik T. M., Toporov V. N., Shur S. M. To the characteristics of the southern part of the Baltic­Slavic language union (BSLU). Problemy lingvoi etnogeografii i areal’noi dialektologii: tezisy dokladov [Problems of linguistic and ethnogeography and areal dialectology: abstracts of reports]. Moscow, 1964, rr. 13-19 (in Russian).

4. Tsykhun G. A. Areal aspects of semantic reconstruction. Studia etymologica Brunensia 1. Praha, 2000, pp. 201-207 (in Belarusian).

5. Martynov V. V. The formation of the Proto-Slavic language according to the data of Slavic-foreign language contacts. Minsk, Nauka i tekhnika Publ., 1982. 44 p. (in Russian).

6. Zhukova I. N., Lebed’ko M. G., Proshina Z. G., Yuzefovich N. G. Dictionary of terms of intercultural communication. Moscow, Flinta: Nauka Publ., 2013. 632 p. (in Russian).

7. Tsykhun G. A. The northern fragment of the West Slavic­East Slavic contact zone. Language space. Linguistic ties. History of words: selected works. Minsk, 2018, pp. 175-179 (in Belarusian).

8. Aidukovich I. On some concepts of lexical contactology. Russian language: its historical destiny and present state: II International congress of Russian language researchers, Moscow, Moscow State University, March 18-21, 2004. Moscow, 2004, pp. 445-447 (in Russian).

9. Aјdukoviћ Ј. Contacteme is the basic unit of linguistic contactology. Slavistika = Slavic studies, 2003, no. 7, pp. 74-84 (in Serbian).

10. Mechkovskaya N. B. General linguistics. Structural and social typology of languages. Minsk, Amalfeya Publ., 2000. 368 p. (in Russian).

11. Yartseva V. N. (ed.). Linguistics: big encyclopedic dictionary. 2nd ed. Moscow, Bol’shaya Rossiiskaya Entsiklodegiya Publ., 1998. 683 p. (in Russian).

12. Tsykhun G. A. Aspects of Slavic areal linguistics. Language space. Linguistic ties. History of words: selected works. Minsk, 2018, pp. 19-35 (in Belarusian).

13. Starichenok V. D. Big linguistic dictionary. Rostov-on-Don, Feniks Publ., 2008. 811 p. (in Russian).

14. Borodina M. A. (ed.). Interaction of linguistic areas: theory, methodology and sources of research. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1980. 272 p. (in Russian).

15. Abragimovich M., Voilkava Ya., Kazlouskaya-Doda Ya., Luchyts-Fedarets I., Mal’ko R., Osipchyk A., Tsykhun G. Interslavic isolexes in Belarusian etymological dictionaries. Minsk, 1998. 16 p. (in Belarusian).

16. Martynov V. V. Slavic-Germanic lexical interaction of the most ancient times: to the problem of the ancestral homeland of the Slavs. Minsk, Publishing House Academian Sciences of the BSSR, 1963. 250 p. (in Russian).

17. Furlan M. Novi etimološki slovar slovenskega jezika. Poskusni zvezek. Ljubljana, Založba ZRC, 2013. 221 p. (in Slovenian). https://doi.org/10.3986/9789612546656

18. Martynov V. V. Balto-Slavic-Italic isoglosses: lexical synonymy. Minsk, Nauka i tekhnika Publ., 1978. 48 p. (in Russian).

19. Tsykhun G. A. South Slavic­East Slavic language connections. Language space. Linguistic ties. History of words: selected works. Minsk, 2018, pp. 74-101 (in Belarusian).

20. Snigirova N. A. North-Eastern areal innovations in the Polish language. Ph.D. Thesis. Minsk, 2009. 175 r. (in Be­ larusian).

21. Stieber Z. Sposoby powstania słowiańskich gwar przejściowych. Świat językowy Słowian. Warszawa, 1974, pp. 33-64 (in Polish).

22. Tsykhun G. A. Innovations of the Slavic contact zones. Language space. Linguistic ties. History of words: selected works. Minsk, 2018, pp. 42-46 (in Belarusian).