Structural linguistic and structural mythology: For what anthropology needs linguistic formalism?
Abstract
Claude Levi-Stross'es structural mythology methodological issues have been examined in the article from the point of view of suitability to use linguistic formalism in anthropologic investigations. Optional and decorative nature of borrowings from structural phonology has been found. Incompatibility of anthropological traditions with formal attitude of structural linguistics has been shown, too.
References
1. Йосипенко, О.М. Философия разума Клода Леви-Стросса: методологический голизм или атомизм? / О. М. Йосипенко // Вестн. Полоц. гос. ун-та. - Серия Е. - 2012. - №7. - С. 158-164.
2. Harris, Z.S. From Morpheme to Utterance / Z.S Harris // Langage. - 1946. - XXII.
3. Harris, Z.S. Co-occurance and Transformation in Linguistic / Z.S Harris // Langage. - 1957. - XXXIII.
4. Levi-Strauss, Cl. Antropologie structurale / Cl. Levi-Strauss. - Paris: Plon, 1958.
5. Levi-Strauss, Cl. Antropologie structurale deux / Cl. Levi-Strauss. - Paris: Plon, 1973.
6. Levi-Strauss, Cl. L'Homme nu / Cl. Levi-Strauss. - Paris: Plon, 1971.
7. Pavel, Th. Le mirage linguistique / Th.Pavel. - Paris: Minuit, 1988.
Review
Views: 572
Email this article 