CIVILIZATIONAL PARADIGM OF THE BELARUSIAN SOCIETY: THEORETICAL-METHODOLOGICAL BASES
Abstract
The article attempts to create a paradigm of specific actions, allowing, using modern methods of analysis and scientific explanation to determine meanings and reference points of different events, to offer systems for social activities, to identify the causes that determine these or other negative processes and phenomena, to find ways to eliminate them, to support innovation, to form an effective model of government and civil society, market economy and the rule of law. Under this approach the definition of «the civilizational code» is analyzed,and also the place and rolego of major factors in the company systemis determined. Among them are the geographical areas, the meaning of life, values, historical memory, customs and traditions, national idea, the mentality, worldview, ideology. It is proposed a specific mechanism of social influence on the development of civilization values, formation, attitudes, ideas, ideals, interests, beliefs and norms of Belarusian society.
About the Author
I. V. Kotlyarov
National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Institute of Sociology
Belarus
D. Sc. (Sociol.), Professor, Director
Belarus
D. Sc. (Sociol.), Professor, Director
References
1. “The President: the flatness with which impose on us the development models is not better than religious fanaticism” Available at: http://news.tut.by/politics/476725.html (accessed: 20.08.2016).
2. Kotlyarov, I. V. (Chapter editor.) (2015) Belarus’ na puti v budushchee: sotsiologicheskoe izmerenie [Belarus on the way to the future: a sociological dimension], the Institute of Sociology, Nat. Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Belaruskaya navuka, Minsk, BY
3. Kotlyarov, I. (2014) “Belarus between the past and the future”, Belaya Vezha, no. 7, pp. 92-105.
4. Kotlyarov, I. (2015) “On the way to the future. Sociological trends”, Belaruskaya Dumka, no. 1, pp. 89-96.
5. Eco, U. “By the semiotic analysis of television messages”, Available at: http://www.nsu.ru/psych/internet/bits/eco.htm (accessed: 20.08.2016).
6. Mukhamedzhanova, N. M. and Boguslavskaya, S. M. (2007) Teoriya kul’tury v voprosakh i otvetakh [Theory of Culture in Questions and Answers], IPK GOU OSU, Orenburg, RU
7. Mezhuev, V. (2016) “Civilization or civilizations? (To disputes around the concept of civilization)”, Knowledge. Understanding. Ability, no. 2, pp. 40-51.
8. Mchedlova, M. M. (1999) “The concept of “civilization”: history and methodology”, Philosophy and Society, no. 1,pp. 139-153.
9. Khangtington, S. (2003) Stolknovenie tsivilizatsii [The Clash of Civilizations], publishing house AST, Minsk, BY
10. Toinbi, A. (2002) Tsivilizatsiya pered sudom istorii [Civilization before the court of history], Rolf, Minsk, BY
11. Harrison, L. (2008) Glavnaya istina liberalizma. Kak politika mozhet izmenit’ kul’turu i spasti ee ot samoi sebya [The main true of liberalism. How politics can change a culture and save it from itself], A new publishing house, Minsk, BY
12. Harrison, L. and Huntington, S. (ed.) (2002) Kul’tura imeet znachenie. Kakim obrazom tsennosti sposobstvuyut obshchestvennomu progressu [Culture matters. How values contribute to social progress], Moscow School of Political Studies, Moscow, RU
13. Volkonskii, V. A. (2008) Smysl zhizni i istoriya [The meaning of life and history], Altai-TAU, Moscow – Kazan’, RU
14. Nitsshe, F. (1990) “On the Use and Abuse of History for Life”, Op.: V 2 t. Vol. 2, Thought, Minsk, BY, pp.158-230.
15. Sulakshin, S. S. (ed.) (2006) Ot dialoga tsivilizatsii k sotrudnichestvu i integratsii. Nabroski problemnogo analiza [From the dialogue of civilizations for cooperation and integration. Outline of problem analysis], 2nd edition, Scientific expert, Minsk, BY
16. “Statement by the Primate of the Russian Church at the enlarged session of the Patriarchal Council for Culture”, Available at: http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/2029569.html (accessed: 20.08.2016).
Review
Views: 1119
Email this article 