Introduction to the ethical and philosophical concept of moral discourse
https://doi.org/10.29235/2524-2369-2022-67-2-149-157
Abstract
This article describes the theoretical and methodological content of the ethical and philosophical concept of moral discourse, demonstrates its advantage in the sense of systematization and integration of heterogeneous theoretical prerequisites for the formation of the concept of moral discourse. It provides a number of ideas that have become prerequisites for the formation of the concept of discourse in philosophy and ethics. The contribution of the methodology of linguistic research, where the discourse was initially most developed, is noted. In addition, the work describes the specific parameters of the ethical and philosophical concept of moral discourse, which are caused by the nature of philosophical knowledge. A consistent analysis of the functions and main subjects of philosophy made it possible to reveal the synergy of the ideological, methodological, and socio-critical functions of philosophy, as well as to substantiate the integrity of moral discourse in the context of the ontological, epistemological, axiological and praxeological consideration. Thus, the paper shows the perspectiveness of the ethical and philosophical concept of moral discourse for disclosing its essence, structure and functions as integrity.
About the Author
M. G. Shatsernik
Institute of Philosophy of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Belarus
Belarus
Miсhael G. Shatsernik – Ph. D. (Philos.), Junior Researcher, Institute of Philosophy of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus.
1 Surganov Str., Bldg 2, Minsk 220072.
References
1. Bolotnikova E. N. Morality as a discursive formation torus. Abstract of Ph. D. diss. Samara, 2006. 18 p. (in Russian).
2. Belyaeva E. V. Parameters of moral discourse. Vesnіk Brestskaga unіversіteta. Seryya 1, Fіlasofіya. Palіtalogіya. Satsyyalogіya = Vesnik of Brest University. Series 1. Phylosophy. Politology. Sociology, 2016, no. 2, pp. 20–26 (in Russian).
3. Belyaeva E. V. Cognitive and communicative aspects of moral discourse. Nauchnye trudy Respublikanskogo instituta vysshei shkoly [Scientific papers of the Republican Institute of Higher Education]. Minsk, 2016, no. 15, pp. 152–159 (in Russian).
4. Oshkina K. V. Ways of linguistic actualization of moral discourse: the example of German-language media torus. Abstract of Ph. D. diss. Irkutsk, 2007. 16 p. (in Russian).
5. Oshkina K. V. Metonymy as a linguistic way of actualizing moral discourse (on the example of the German language). Izvestiya Irkutskoi gosudarstvennoi ekonomicheskoi akademii = Bulletin of the Irkutsk State Economic Academy, 2007, no. 1, pp. 97–99 (in Russian).
6. Saussure F. de. Cours de linguistique générale [General linguistics course]. Paris, Payot, 1972. 510 p. (in French).
7. Wittgenstein L. Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung [Tractatus logico-philosophicus]. Annalen der Naturphilosophie, 1921, vol. 4, pt. 3/4, pp. 185–262 (in German).
8. Apel K.-O. Transformation der philosophie. Frankfurt Am Main, Suhrkamp, 1973. 2 vol. (in German).
9. Habermas J. Ethics of discourse: notes on the justification program. Moral consciousness and communicative action. St. Petersburg, 2001, pp. 67–172 (in Russian).
10. Shatsernik M. G. A comparative analysis of the philosophical and ethical theory of discourse by M. Foucault and J. Habermas. Vesnik Brestskaga universiteta. Seryya 1, Filasofiya. Palitalogiya. Satsyyalogiya = Vesnik of Brest University. Series 1. Phylosophy. Politology. Sociology, 2017, no. 1, pp. 47–52 (in Russian).
11. Foucault M. L’herméneutique du sujet: cours au Collège de France (1981–1982) [The hermeneutics of the subject: course at the College de France (1981–1982)]. Paris, Gallimard, 2001. 540 p. (in French).
12. Deleuze G., Guattari F. Capitalisme et schizophénie, mille plateaux [Capitalism and schizophenia, a thousand plateaus]. Paris, Éditions de Minuit, 1980. 645 p. (in French).
13. Levinas E. Favorites. Totality and infinite. Moscow, Kul’turnaya initsiativa Publ.; St. Petersburg, Universitetskaya knina Publ., 2000. 416 p. (in Russian).
14. Stepin V. S. Philosophy. Philosophy: an encyclopedic dictionary. Moscow, 2004, pp. 909–912 (in Russian).
15. Guseinov A. A. Philosophy as ethical project. Voprosy philosophii, 2014, no. 5, pp. 16–26 (in Russian).
16. Stepin V. S., Kuznetsova L. F. Scientific picture of the world in the culture of technogenic civilization. Moscow, Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1994. 274 p. (in Russian).
17. Shatsernik M. G. Problem of the subject in the philosophy of discourse. Philosophiya i sotsial’nye nauki = The Journal of Philosophy and Social Sciences, 2016, no. 2, pp. 18–22 (in Russian).
18. Stepin V. S. Theoretical knowledge: structure, historical evolution. Moscow, Progress-traditsiya Publ., 2003. 743 p. (in Russian).
19. Lektorskii V. A. On classical and non-classical epistemology. Na puti k neklassicheskoi epistemologii [Towards a non-classical epistemology]. Moscow, 2009, pp. 7–24 (in Russian).
20. Baudrillard J. Pour une critique de l’economie politique du signe [For a critique of the political economy of the sign]. Paris, Gallimard, 1972. 268 p. (in French).
Review
Views: 350
Email this article 