Resonant processes in society: explicit and implicit content
https://doi.org/10.29235/2524-2369-2025-70-2-95-102
Abstract
The article is the first to study the forms and mechanisms of action of tacit knowledge in resonant processes in society. The specificity of expressing the forms of this knowledge at the levels of subject ideas about the carriers of resonant processes, normative instructions for their study and reflexive understanding of the results obtained is revealed. Based on the materials of the theory of imitation, the concepts of memes, autopoiesis and mirror neurons, the productivity of a conjugate analysis of the functioning of tacit knowledge in the resonant processes of society using the means of natural science and social sciences is shown. The main reasons for the relativism of the importance of tacit knowledge among specific people and social groups are identified; the most important of them is the personal nature of tacit knowledge, the range of which extends from worldview ideas typical of a particular culture and historical era to individual subtleties and preferences in understanding the components of the universe and specific situations in the life world of the individual.
About the Author
V. K. Lukashevich
Institute of Philosophy of the National
Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Belarus
Belarus
Vladimir K. Lukashevich – D. Sc. (Philos.), Professor,
Chief Researcher
1 Surganov Str., Bldg 2,
Minsk 220072
References
1. Tsvetkov V. Ia. Tacit knowledge and its variants. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya = Perspectives of Science and Education, 2014, no. 1 (7), pp. 56–60 (in Russian).
2. Sheina I. M. Role of background knowledge in written discourse comprehension. Vestnik Pomorskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki [Vestnik of Pomor University. Series: Humanitarian and Social Sciences], 2009, no. 6, pp. 111–117 (in Russian).
3. Lukashevich V. K. Scientific discourse: creative interaction of subject, normative, and reflective knowledge. Vos’moi Rossiiskii filosofskii kongress «Filosofiya v politsentrichnom mire». Sektsiya 1: sbornik nauchykh statei [Eighth Russian philosophical congress “Philosophy in a polycentric world”. Section 1: collection of scientific articles]. Moscow, 2020, pp. 147–149 (in Russian).
4. His Divine Grace A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada. Bhagavad-Gita as it is. 2nd ed. Bhaktivedanta Book Trust, 1990. 720 p.
5. Tarde G. Les lois de l’imitation: étude sociologique. Paris, Alcan F., 1890. 445 p. (in French).
6. Dawkins R. The selfish gene. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1976. 224 p.
7. Rizzolatti G., Graghero L. The mirror – neuron system. Annual Reviews of Neuroscience, 2004, vol. 27, pp. 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
8. Varela F. J. Patterns of life: intertwining identity and cognition. Brain and Cognition, 1997, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1997.0907
9. Thompson E. Life and mind: autopoesis to neirophenomejlogy. A tribute to Francisco Varela. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 2004, vol. 3, pp. 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:phen.0000048936.73339.dd
10. Rosa H. Resonanz. Eine soziologie der weltbeziehung. Berlin, Suhrkamp, 2018. 815 p. (in German).
11. Anishchenko V. S., Neiman A. B., Moos F., ShimanskyGeier L. Stochastic resonance: noise enhanced order. PhysicsUspekhi, 1999, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 7–36. https://doi.org/10.1070/pu1999v042n01abeh000444
Review
Views:
554
Email this article 