On the role of mentoring in the system of training highly qualified scientific staff (on the example of the Republic of Belarus)

The research is devoted to the study of the institute of scientific mentoring as one of the mechanisms for the reproduction and strengthening of the country’s intellectual human resources potential. The purpose of the work is to identify the role of mentoring and individual aspects of its functioning in the system of training highly qualified scientific personnel. The scientific and practical significance of the study lies in obtaining unique sociological data necessary for the development of scientifically based recommendations, the implementation of which will improve the efficiency of scientific mentoring and training of highly qualified scientific personnel. The research methodology is based on such conceptual approaches of sociological discourse as exchange theory, symbolic interactionism, understanding sociology, phenomenological sociology and social constructionism. The methods of collecting empirical data are questionnaire survey, expert survey by interview method. Comprehensive sociological research conducted in 2024 found that most degree seekers feel support by their institute staff and can ask colleagues for professional help if necessary. Among the identified conditions that are associated with scientific mentoring and determine the preparation of dissertations, the assistance of a scientific supervisor occupies leading position. According to the majority of respondents, their organization implements to one degree or another all the tasks of scientific mentoring within the framework of training highly qualified scientific personnel. At the same time, two tasks of scientific mentoring are least implemented: creation and development of scientific schools; formation of successful role models of scientists in science. More than half of applicants for academic degrees indicated that the institution of scientific mentoring influences the indicators of reproduction of human resources potential of science in the Republic of Belarus. The results obtained during the research work indicate the need to further enhance the role of the institute of scientific mentoring as one of the key factors in the training of highly qualified scientific personnel to ensure the personnel security of the state in the scientific sphere.

1. Program for improving the scientific sphere of the Republic of Belarus: resolution of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, State Committee for Science and Technology of the Republic of Belarus, December 24, 2013, no. 5/25 // National Academy of Sciences of Belarus. Available at: http://nasb.gov.by/reference/razvitie/programma.pdf (accessed 12.08.2025) (in Russian).

2. About the State Program “Education and Youth Policy” for 2021–2025: resolution of the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Belarus, January 29, 2021, no. 57. National Legal Internet Portal of the Republic of Belarus. Available at: http:// pravo.by/upload/docs/op/C22100057_1612386000.pdf (accessed 12.08.2025) (in Russian).

3. Byars­Winston A., Dahlberg M. L. (eds.). The science of effective mentorship in STEMM. Washington, The National Academies Press, 2019. XXVIII, 288 p. https://doi.org/10.17226/25568

4. Parsons T., Bales R. F., Shils E. Working papers in the theory of action. New York, Free Press, 1953. 269 p.

5. Clutterbuck D., Megginson D. Mentoring in action: a practical guide. 2nd ed. London, Kogan Page, 2006. 267 p.

6. Shlychkov S. V., Gusakov V. G. (eds.). On the state and prospects for the development of science in the Republic of Belarus based on the results of 2022: analytical report. Minsk, Belarusian Institute of Systems Analysis and Information Support for Scientific and Technical Spheres, 2023. 298 p. (in Russian).

7. Parsons T. The social system. Glencoe, Free Press, 1952. 575 p.

8. Merton R. K. Social theory and social structure. New York, Free Press, 1968. 702 p.

9. Homans G. C. Social behavior: its elementary forms. New York, Harcourt, Brace & World, 1961. 404 p.

10. Mead G. H. Mind, self, and society. 2nd ed. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1937. 401 p.

11. Blumer H. Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1969. 208 p.

12. Weber M. Understanding sociology. Moscow, AST Publ., 2021. 480 p. (in Russian).

13. Schutz A. The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, Northwestern University Press, 1967. XXXVI, 255 p.

14. Garfinkel H. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1967. 288 p.

15. Berger P. L., Luckmann T. The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York, Doubleday & Company, 1966. 249 p.

16. Salavei A. P. Institution of scientific mentoring: opinion of the academic degree applicants in the Republic of Belarus. Nauka i innovatsii = Science and Innovation, 2025, no. 6, pp. 63–68 (in Russian).