WORD FORMATION RELATIONS IN THE LEXICAL SEMANTIC FIELD “GEOGRAPHIC LANDSCAPE” IN THE RUSSIAN AND BELARUSIAN LANGUAGES
Анатацыя
The article explores word formation relations between units of the lexical semantic field “Geographical Landscape” in the Russian and Belarusian languages. These relations can be identified by building lexical semantic variants of word formation nests, i.e. nest fragments comprising only elements that are part of the lexical semantic field under study. The comparison analysis is based on the following parameters: 1) type of headword; 2) number of elements; 3) structural features: a) presence of syntagmatic and paradigmatic units; b) number of word formation stages; c) presence of word formation lacunas. The most common word formation methods for field units are specified: suffixation, prefixation and suffixation, and compounding with suffixation. Least of the words nominating natural objects are formed by prefixation. The comparative analysis of lexical semantic variants of word formation nests in Russian and Belarusian.shows that there is much in common in the word formation relations between units of the lexical semantic field “Geographical Landscape” in the both languages. A nest fragment headword can be a part of the field under study or a part of other fields. The quantitative composition varies from 2 to 32 units. Nest fragments of field elements contain horizontal and vertical level units; derivatives demonstrate no more than 3 derivation stages. Differences in the structure of lexical semantic variants of word formation nests are associated with varied ways of nominating correlative notions in closely related languages and varied word formation means and methods in Russian and Belarusian languages.
Праглядаў: 934
Паслаць артыкул па эл. пошце 