Assessment of interregional differentiation of labor productivity in the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation
https://doi.org/10.29235/2524-2369-2020-65-1-103-116
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of interregional differentiation of labor productivity. International comparisons of the level of labor productivity per one employed in the economy have been carried out. Distinctive criteria for determining and statistical accounting of high-performance workplaces in Belarus and Russia have been identified. A methodological approach to assessing the conformity of available workplaces to a high-productivity level in the regions in the medium and high-tech sector of Belarus is proposed. The regions of Belarus with a lower level of labor productivity in comparison with the national average are identified. A positive relationship between the availability of high-performance workplaces and gross regional product is confirmed. The industry distribution of high-performance workplaces in Russia is presented. A high level of interregional differentiation of labor productivity in Russia compared with Belarus was identified. Comprehensive measures have been worked out to stimulate the growth of labor productivity and the creation of high-performance workplaces in the regions of Belarus and Russia.
About the Authors
A. V. PrasniakovaBelarus
Alena V. Prasniakova – Ph. D. (Econ.), Associate Рrofessor, Head of Industrial Policy
1 Surganov Str., Bldg 2, 220141, MinskM. B. Petrov
Russian Federation
Mikhail B. Petrov – D. Sc. (Technic.), Associate Professor, Head of the Development and deployment of productive forces Center
29 Moscowskaya Str., 620014 Ekaterinburg
S. N. Smirnykh
Russian Federation
Svetlana N. Smirnykh – Ph. D. (Econ.), Associate Professor
62 Vosmogo marta Str., 620014 EkaterinburgE. V. Potaptseva
Russian Federation
Ekaterina V. Potaptseva – Ph. D. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Senior Researcher
29 Moscowskaya Str., 620014 Ekaterinburg
V. A. Lee
Russian Federation
Valentina Arkad’evna Lee – Principal Economist
Scopus Author ID: 57190430267
29 Moscowskaya Str., 620014 Ekaterinburg
References
1. World Development Report 2013: Jobs. Washington, The World Bank, 2012. 401 p. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-9575-2
2. Basu S., Pascali L., Schiantarelli F., Serven L. Productivity and the welfare of nations. Discussion paper, no. 6461. Bonn, IZA, 2012. 65 p. https://doi.org/10.3386/w17971
3. Jinjarak Y., Naknoi K. Competition, labor Intensity, and specialization: structural changes in post crisis Asia. ADB Economics Working Paper Series, no. 289. Manila, Asian Development Bank, 2011. 26 p. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2022656
4. Alvarez R., Zahler A., Bravo-Ortega C. Innovation and productivity in services: evidence from Chile. Availavle at: https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Innovation-and-Productivity-in-Services-Evidence-from-Chile.pdf
5. Zaitsev A. A. Cross-country analysis of sectoral labor productivity in years 1991–2008. Moscow, The Institute of Economics RAS, 2014. 44 p. (in Russian).
6. Presniakova E. V. Stimulation of labor productivity growth through investment policy measures. Novaya ekonomika [New Economy], 2014, no. 1 (63), pp. 258–264 (in Russian).
7. Presnyakova E. V. Investment factors of productivity growth in Belarus. Nauka i innovacii = Science and Innovations, 2014, no. 9 (139), pp. 35–38 (in Russian).
8. Voskoboinikov I., Gimpel’son V. Productivity growth, structural change and informality: the case of Russia. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2015, no. 11, pp. 30–61 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-11-30-61
9. Kireev V. E. Productivity, profitability and intensity of labor: Russia and the OECD. Vestnik UrFU. Seriya ekonomika i upravlenie = Bulletin of Ural Federal University. Series Economics and Management, 2017, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 308–326 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2017.16.2.016
10. Mikheeva N. N. Workforce productivity in Russian regions: comparative analysis. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya = Region: Economics and Sociology, 2015, no. 2 (86), pp. 86–112 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.15372/REG20150605
11. Gimpel’son V. E., Kapelyushnikov R. I. Polarization or upgrading? Evolution of employment in transitionary Russia: working paper WP3/2015/01. Moscow, Higher School of Economics Publ. House, 2015. Available at: https://www.hse.ru/data/2015/02/27/1091543859/WP3_2015_01__.pdf (in Russian).
12. Volkova N. N., Romanyuk E. I. Evaluation of high-performance workplaces: comparison of methods. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiiskoi akademii nauk = The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2015, no. 5, pp. 89–97 (in Russian).
13. Kokoulina E. E. How to evaluate the high-performance workplaces in modern Russia? Problemy ucheta i finansov = Problems of Accounting and Finance, 2013, no. 3 (11), pp. 56–59 (in Russian).
14. Korovkin A. G. Current status and prospects of employment sphere and labor market developments in Russia: macroeconomic estimates. Zhurnal novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association, 2018, no. 1 (37), pp. 168–176 (in Russian).
15. Kadochnikov S. M., Tolmachev D. E. High-performance jobs in industry in the Sverdlovsk region: report. Available at: http://sospp.ru/wp-content/uploads/3.-Выступление-С.М.-Кадочникова-13.12.12.pptx (accessed 15.05.2016) (in Russian).
16. Potaptseva E. V. Create high-performance jobs in the region (on the example Sverdlovsk region). Drukerovskii vestnik = Drukerovskij vestnik, 2017, no. 1 (15), pp. 217–234. http://dx.doi.org/10.17213/2312-6469-2017-1-218-235
17. Kozlova O. A., Smirnykh S. N., Potaptseva E. V. Labor productivity increasing in the regions of Ural: tools and methods to stimulate. Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami = Management of Economic Systems, 2018, no. 12 (118). Available at: http://uecs.ru/regionalnaya-ekonomika/item/5269-2018-12-14-13-43-35 (in Russian).