Artificial intelligence and creativity
https://doi.org/10.29235/2524-2369-2022-67-1-15-20
Abstract
The Lovelace Test is one of the most famous alternatives to the Turing Test. It suggests to use the concept of creativity as a way to estimate the ability of artificial intelligence to think in the same sense as a human being. It is demonstrated in the article that the concept of creativity is too ambiguous to be used as a criteria of anything. It is shown that both versions of the Lovelace Test are inherently behaviorist and therefore cannot prove the ability of a machine to think.
About the Author
I. K. Stavrovsky
Institute of Philosophy of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Belarus
Belarus
Igor K. Stavrovsky – Junior Scientific Researcher
1 Surganov Str., Bldg 2, 220072 Minsk
References
1. Dreyfus H. L. What computers can't do: a critique of artificial reason. Cambridge, MIT Press, 1992. 429 p.
2. Il'in E. P. Psychology of creativity, creativity, giftedness. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2008. 433 p. (in Russian).
3. The orchestra played a symphony completed by AI. Available at: https://naked-science.ru/article/hi-tech/orkestr-sygralzakonchennuyu-ii (accessed 21.02.2021) (in Russian).
4. Searle J. Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1980, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00005756
5. Turing A. Computing machinery and intelligence. Moscow, AST Publ., 2018. 128 p. (in Russian).
6. Bringsjord S., Bello P., Ferrucci D. A. Creativity, the Turing Test, and the (Better) Lovelace Test. The Turing test: the elusive standard of artificial intelligence. Dordrecht, 2003, pp. 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0105-2_12
7. Riedl M. O. The Lovelace 2.0 Test of artificial creativity and intelligence. Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1410.6142. pdf (accessed 21.02.2021).
Review
Views: 631
Email this article 