Administrative and delict policy of the Republic of Belarus: trends, achievements, increasing the efficiency of realization
https://doi.org/10.29235/2524-2369-2022-67-1-110-117
Abstract
This article discusses the main trends, achievements and problems of forming and implementing the administrative and delict policy of the Republic of Belarus as a strategy of governing the state to ensure law and order, combating administrative offenses in various spheres of public relations. The modern tasks of the state predetermine the transformation and new trends in the development of administrative and delict policy of the state. The most striking manifestation of these changes is the reform of the law on administrative offences. The main innovations of the law on administrative offences, provided for as a result of its reform, are presented. In order to improve the efficiency of the formation and implementation of administrative and delicate policies, the need for legal forecasting tools for the consequences of new prohibitions and measures of administrative and legal coercion is justified. A system of indicators has been developed to conduct a full cycle of assessment of the regulatory impact of administrative law. The expansion of the subjects and facilities for assessing the regulatory impact of regulations in the application of administrative and legal coercion measures is justified.
About the Author
V. K. Ladutko
Belarusian State Economic University
Belarus
Belarus
Viyaleta K. Ladutko – Ph. D. (Law), Associate Professor, Deputy Head of the Center for Systemic Analysis
26 Partizanskii Ave., Minsk 220070
References
1. Marchenko M. N. Legal policy: the concept, the subjects, the mechanism of the implementation. Vestnik Moskowskogo universiteta. Seriya 11, Pravo = Moscow University Law Bulletin, 2013, no. 5, pp. 26–37 (in Russian).
2. Matuzov N. I., Mal'ko A. V. (eds.). Theory of state and law. 2nd ed. Moscow, Yurist" Publ., 2000. 772 p. (in Russian).
3. Rudkovskiy V. A. Principles of legal policy: notion and content. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii = Saratov State Law Academy Bulletin, 2016, no. 6 (113), pp. 11–14 (in Russian).
4. Konstantinov P. Yu., Solovieva A. K., Stukanov A. P. Administrative and tort policy as one of the orientations of the administrative reform in the Russian Federation. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Pravovedenie = Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Jurisprudence, 2007, no. 1 (270), pp. 5–20 (in Russian).
5. Shergin A. P. Administrative and delict law problems. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 1994, no. 8-9, pp. 52–65 (in Russian).
6. Shergin A. P. Is necessary the theory administrative of delictolisation. Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika = Law and the State: Theory and Practice, 2005, no. 1, pp. 41–45 (in Russian).
7. Code of the Republic of Belarus on Administrative Offences, 6 January 2021, no. 91-Z. Available at: https://etalonline.by/document/?regnum=hk2100091 (accessed 15.02.2021) (in Russian).
8. Procedure-Executive Code of the Republic of Belarus on Administrative Offences, 6 January 2021, no. 92-Z. National Legal Internet Portal of the Republic of Belarus. Available at: https://pravo.by/document/?guid=12551&p0=HK2100092&p1=1&p5=0 (accessed 15.02.2021) (in Russian).
9. Trofimov V. V. The scientific validity of legal policy as a factor in minimizing risks in the dynamic structure of the law. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika = Juridical Techniques, 2019, no. 13, pp. 368–377 (in Russian)
Review
Views: 455
Email this article 