Transformations of everyday cognition in modern society
https://doi.org/10.29235/2524-2369-2023-68-1-7-14
Abstract
The focus of the study is on analyzing the transformations of everyday cognition in modern society on the basis of the epistemological paradigm by V. S. Stepin. This paradigm is a productive research program that has enabled us to structure everyday cognition and systematize its functions. In the present study the transformations of the object, subject, goals and means of everyday cognition in the modern digital society have been identified. The specific character of the influence of digital technocode on the subject of everyday cognition has been considered. It is concluded that the epistemological paradigm by V. S. Stepin is a fruitful methodological basis for the study of everyday cognition and its transformations in modern society.
About the Author
R. N. Dozhdikova
Institute of Philosophy of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
Belarus
Belarus
Raisa N. Dozhdikova – Ph. D. (Philos.), Associate Professor
65 Nezavisimosti Avе., Minsk 220013
References
1. Kuhn T. S. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago, London, University of Chicago Press, 1970. 210 p.
2. Arshinov V. I., Blyukher F. N., Budanov V. G., Burgete Ayala M. R., Vasyukov V. V., Gerasimova I. A. (et al.). Science and culture coevolution in Vyacheslav S. Stepin’s works papers of the “round table». Filosofiya nauki i tehniki = Philosophy of Science and Technology, 2019, vol. 24. no. 1, pp. 7–45 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21146/2413-9084-2019-24-1-7-45
3. Stepin V. S. Theoretical knowledge: structure, historical evolution. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2003. 744 p. (in Russian).
4. Dozhdikova R. N. Everyday cognition in the context of civilizational development. Minsk, Belarusian National Technical University, 2020. 210 p. (in Russian).
5. Dozhdikova R. N. Modern structure of everyday cognition. Vestsi Natsyyanal’nai akademii navuk Belarusi. Seryia humanitarnykh navuk = Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus. Humanitarian Series, 2021, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 263–270 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.29235/2524-2369-2021-66-3-263-270
6. Dozhdikova R. N. Cognitive analysis of the everyday cognition functions. Zhurnal Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Sotsiologiya = Journal of t he B elarusian S tate University. S ociology, 2022, no. 2, pp. 18–26 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6821-2022-2-18-26
7. Lukashevich V. K. Creative interaction of subject, normative and reflexive knowledge in scientific search. Minsk, Belaruskaya navuka Publ., 2019. 299 p. (in Russian).
8. Dozhdikova R. N. Special features of everyday cognition and the development of an image of science in social consciousness. Voprosy Filosofii, 2018, vol. 7, pp. 196–206 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S004287440000241-0
9. Stepin V. S. On the methodological approaches to the social cognition analysis. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 7, Filosofiya = Moscow University Bulletin. Series 7. Philosophy, 2014, vol. 3, pp. 3–10 (in Russian).
10. Dozhdikova R. N. Everyday cognition and some problems of cognitive socialization. Zhurnal Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Sotsiologiya = Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology, 2018, no. 1, pp. 30–40 (in Russian).
11. Mironov V. V., Sokuler Z. A. Longing for true objective reality in digital culture. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 7, Filosofiya = Moscow University Bulletin. Series 7. Philosophy, 2018, no. 1, pp. 3–22 (in Russian).
12. Skinner Ch. Digital human: the fourth revolution of humanity includes everyone. Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2018. 328 p.
13. Castells M. The internet Galaxy: reflections on the Internet, business, and society. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002. 292p.
14. Castells M. The Information age: economy, society and culture. Moscow, Higher School of Economics, 2000. 608 p. (in Russian).
15. Kasavin I. T., Shchavelev S. P. The analysis of alltdglichkeit. Moscow, Kanon+ Publ., 2004. 431 p. (in Russian).
16. Dennett D. Sweet dreams: philosophical obstacles to a science of consciousness. Cambridge, MIT Press, 2005. 199 p. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6576.001.0001
17. Lektorsky V. A. Philosophy, cognition, culture. Moscow, Kanon+ Publ., 2012. 383 p. (in Russian).
18. Lektorsky V. A. Constructive realism as the contemporary form of epistemological realism. Filosofiya nauki i tehniki = Philosophy of Science and Technology, 2018, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 18–22 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21146/2413-9084-2018-23-2-18-22
19. Dozhdikova R. N. About the truth in the scientific and everyday cognition. Voprosy Filosofii, 2022, vol. 7, pp. 98–108 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-7-98-108
20. Gerasimova I. A. (ed.). Problems and risks of engineering education in the XXI century. Moscow, Universitetskaya kniga Publ., 2017. 309 p. (in Russian).
21. Dozhdikova R. N. Everyday cognition, digitalization and digital fascism. Informatsionnye tekhnologii v politicheskikh, sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh i tekhnicheskikh sistemakh: materialy nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, 22 aprelya 2022 g. [Information technologies in political, socio-economic and technical systems: materials of the scientific and practical conference on April 22, 2022]. Minsk, 2022, pp. 63–65 (in Russian).
22. Eco U. The university and the mass media. Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, 1994, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 81–94.
Review
Views: 491
Email this article 