Methodological toolkit sciences of information law
https://doi.org/10.29235/2524-2369-2024-69-2-160-168
Abstract
The author raises the problem of the relevance of educational means tested by law to the information agenda. The online world has presented legal theory and legal practice with difficult questions. The well-trodden strategies of legal positivism are programmed for a different status state of society than the state of a network-type society. Previous approaches are not always effective regarding communication processes. Information law, more than other legal disciplines, feels the need for creative research tools. Its use is associated with certain risks. However, the formulation and solution of non-trivial cognitive problems requires the reinforcement of traditional methodological strategies with innovative ones. Information-legal, synergetic, phenomenological and other approaches, mastering axiological techniques and convergent techniques are called upon to replenish the heuristic resource of formal dogmatic means. Fidelity to the authority of traditions, together with a readiness to verify unknown research experience, is the way to increase scientific knowledge.
About the Author
E. V. PerepelitsaBelarus
Elena V. Perepelitsa – Ph. D. (Law), Associate Professor, Senior Researcher.
1a Berson Str., Minsk 220030
References
1. Dadjukova M. N. Prospects for the development of legal science in the future. Science Time, 2022, no. 1 (97), pp. 5–13 (in Russian).
2. Bachilo I. L. Society, state and modern information technologies. Informatsionnye tekhnologii: Innovatsii v gosudarstvennom upravlenii: sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Information technology: Innovation in public administration: collection scientific works]. Мoscow, 2010, pp. 8–23 (in Russian).
3. Ivanskiy V. P., Kovalev S. I. The role of rationality philosophy in legal studies (Part II). Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki = RUDN Journal of Law, 2019, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 184–199 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2019-23-2-184-199
4. Zapol’skii S. V., Isakov V. B. New topical grounds for modernisation in the sphere of information technology law. Pravovaya informatika = Legal Informatics, 2023, no. 1, pp. 4–14 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21681/1994-1404-2023-1-4-14
5. Shatkovskaya T. V., Larina O. G. The method of historical criticism in modern legal studies. Filosofiya prava = Philo- sophy of Law, 2019, no. 3 (90), pp. 14–19 (in Russian).
6. Sumarokova L. N. Legal logic: a communicative concept. Odessa, Feniks Publ., 2015. 204 p. (in Russian).
7. Lovtsov D. A. Systemology of information law. Pravosudie = Justice, 2022, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 41–70 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.37399/2686-9241.2022.1.41-70
8. Zharova A. K., Elin V. M. Development of the science of information law abroad. Information law, Fedotov M. A. ed. Moscow, 2023, pp. 68–75 (in Russian).
9. Averintsev S. «Ad fontes!» (Athens, Jerusalem, Rome). The Word of God and the Word of Man. Roman speeches. Moscow, 2023, pp. 273–280 (in Russian).
10. Barsukov I. S. Logical bounds of Kant’s dialectics. Vestnik Krasnoyarskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. V. P. Astaf’eva (Vestnik KGPU) = Bulletin of Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V. P. Astafyev (Bulletin KSPU), 2009, no. 2, pp. 38–43 (in Russian).
11. Syrykh V. M. Russian jurists at the crossroads: materialistic rationalism or subjective idealism? Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2016, no. 1 (229), pp. 75–89 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.12737/17233
12. Malakhov I. P. The variety of methodologies of modern theory of state and law: historical methodology. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava [History of State and Law], 2009, no. 20, pp. 46–48 (in Russian).
13. Gribanov D. V. On the issue of the legal theory of cybernetic space. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2010, no. 4, pp. 57–62 (in Russian).
14. Obrazhiev K. V. Systematic approach in jurisprudence: theoretical and methodological foundations. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A. S. Pushkina = Pushkin Leningrad State University Journal, 2012, no. 1, pp. 89–96 (in Russian).
15. Napalkova I. G. Technic method as a basis of the methodology of legal positivism. Filosofiya prava = Philosophy of Law, 2018, no. 3 (86), pp. 7–12 (in Russian).
16. Malinovsky A. A. Methodology of comparative law. Vestnik Universiteta im. O. E. Kutafina (MGYuA) = Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), 2016, no. 3 (19), pp. 9–24 (in Russian).
17. Bajev V. G., Vlasova O. I. Positivism as the dominating theory law and right in modern Russia. Sovremennoe pravo [Modern Law], 2011, no. 8, pp. 22–28 (in Russian).
18. Salikov M. S., Nesmeyanova S. E., Mochalov A. N., Kolobaeva N. E., Ivanova K. A. Human rights on the Internet. Ekaterinburg, UMTs UPI Publ., 2019. 148 p. (in Russian).
19. Arshinov V. I. Synergetics as a phenomenon of post-non-classical science. Moscow, Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1999. 203 p. (in Russian).
20. Petrov A. V., Zyryanov A. V. Synergetic approach in modern legal studies. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo = Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Law, 2017, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 102–106 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.14529/law170419
21. Kokotov A. N., Malinova I. P. (eds.). Synergetics and hermeneutics in jurisprudence and socio-legal regulation. Moscow, Norma Publ., Infra-M Publ., 2020. 214 p. (in Russian).
22. Garashko A. Yu. Synergetic approach as a basis development of system methodology legal science. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika = Juridical Techniques, 2023, no. 17, pp. 250–252 (in Russian).
23. Chepkasova E. V. Hermeneutic and phenomenological approaches to text analysis. Bibliosfera = Bibliosphere, 2008, no. 1, pp. 39–42 (in Russian).
24. Kozhevnikov V. V. About the hermeneutic method in law. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo = Herald of Omsk University. Series Law, 2020, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 15–26 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.24147/1990-5173.2020.17(1).15-26
25. Schleiermacher F. D. E. Hermeneutik und Kritik. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1977. 466 p. (in German).
26. Dolgolenko T. N., Finogentova O. E. Axiological and formal legal meaning of the interpretation of law. Ekaterinburg, UMTs UPI Publ., 2013. 152 p. (in Russian).
27. Makarov O. S. Legal support of information security using the example of protecting state secrets of member states of the Commonwealth of Independent States. Ph.D. Thesis. Moscow, 2013. 444 p. (in Russian).
28. Gabrus’ I. F. Losses and finds of phenomenology. Velikie preobrazovateli estestvoznaniya: Immanuil Kant: tezisy dokladov: XV Mezhdunarodnye chteniya, Minsk, 24–25 noyabrya 1999 g. [Great transformers of natural science: Immanuel Kant: XV International readings, Minsk, November 24–25, 1999]. Мinsk, 1999, pp. 54–58 (in Russian).
29. Ulanovskii A. M. Phenomenological method in psychology, psychiatry and psychotherapy. Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii [Methodology and History of Psychology], 2007, vol. 2, iss. 1, pp. 130–150 (in Russian).
30. Pantykina M. I. Phenomenology of legal life: methodology and socio-philosophical aspect of research. Abstract of Ph.D. diss. Ekaterinburg, 2010. 46 p. (in Russian).
31. Kuznetsov P. U. Synergetic grounds for legal support of information realities. Synergetics and hermeneutics in jurisprudence and socio-legal regulation. Moscow, 2020, pp. 166–183 (in Russian).
32. Kuzheleva-Sagan I. P., Spicheva D. I. The phenomenon of digital nomadism in the modern interdisciplinary discourse. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Tomsk State University Journal, 2020, no. 454, pp. 72–87 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/454/9
33. Verenich V. G. Relative and universal in the methodology of legal semiotics. Relativism in law. St. Petersburg, 2021, pp. 272–282 (in Russian).
34. Sergevnin S. L. Relativism in law and relativism of legal understanding: legal hypostases and legal methodologies. Relativism in law. St. Petersburg, 2021, pp. 70–87 (in Russian).
35. Мirskii E. M. Interdisciplinary research and disciplinary organization of science. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1980. 304 p. (in Russian).
36. Shybut I. P. Formation of professional competencies of a modern journalist in the context of information and communication convergence. Zhurnal Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Zhurnalistika = Journal of the Belarusian State University. Journalism, 2022, no. 2, pp. 4–9 (in Russian).
37. Malakhov V. P. Philosophy of law and legal sciences: “bound by one chain”. Aktual’nye napravleniya analiza prava i pravovedeniya: problema mezhdistsiplinarnogo ponimaniya i sotrudnichestva: materialy devyatykh filosofsko-pravovykh chtenii pamyati akademika V. S. Nersesyantsa [Current directions in the analysis of law and jurisprudence: the problem of interdisciplinary understanding and cooperation: materials of the ninth philosophical and legal readings in memory of academician. V. S. Nersesyants]. Moscow, 2015, pp. 54–61 (in Russian).
38. Sinyukov V. N. Russian legal system. Introduction to general theory. Moscow, Norma Publ., Infra-M Publ., 2016. 670 p. (in Russian).



















