Preview

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Humanitarian Series

Advanced search

A novel study: history and modernity

https://doi.org/10.29235/2524-2369-2019-64-2-200-208

Abstract

There is the necessity in the contemporary science of literature for development of the intra-genre novel typology to systematize the knowledge of certain novel texts and determine the aesthetic possibilities of the modern novel. Traditionally the genre novel typology is considered in social-historical way and based on its content characteristics. Representatives of formalistic approach suppose the genre as a system of methods; they emphasize the artistic uniqueness of new novel form, which determines the specificity of the plot development and theme disclosure in a novel. G. N. Pospelov associates the interpretation of characters with the plot-composition peculiarities, M. M. Bakhtin formulates the idea of dialogue, defines the monologic and polyphonic novels. Bakhtin’s novel theory is developed by N. A. Verderevskaya, focusing on the image structure of protagonist. A. Ya. Esalnek considers the genre of a novel in close interconnection between the method and style of the author. N. S. Leites carries on the tradition of formalistic approach, and according to the type of plot formation, singles out a novel of direct and indirect reflection. N. D. Tamarchenko retraces the novel evolution through its aesthetic potential in the works of famous authors. The classifications developed in Western European literary criticism (the Anglo-American school of “neo criticism”, the German school of “interpretation”) are distinguished with dualism or variability. They focus on the structural organization, the artistic relationship between the author and narrator, author and character.

About the Author

A. V. Novoseltseva
Vitebsk State University named after P. M. Masherov.
Russian Federation

Anna V. Novoseltseva – Ph. D. (Philol.), Associate Professor.

33 Moskovski Str., Vitebsk 210038.



References

1. Esalnek A. Ya. Intra genre typology and ways to study it. Moscow, Moscow State University, 1985. 183 p. (in Russian).

2. Yakimenko L. G. On the roads of the century: current issues of soviet literature. 2nd ed. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1978. 494 p. (in Russian).

3. Veselovskii A. N. History or novel theory? Izbrannye stat’i [Featured Articles]. Leningrad, 1939, pp. 3–22 (in Russian).

4. Tynyanov Yu. N. On literary evolution. Poetics. Literary history. Cinema. Moscow, 1977, pp. 270–281 (in Russian).

5. Tomashevskii B. V. Theory of Literature. Poetics. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ., 1999. 334 p. (in Russian).

6. Bakhtin M. M. Collected works. Vol. 3. The theory of the novel (1930–1961). Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur Publ., 2012. 880 p. (in Russian).

7. Zatonskii D. V. Art of the novel and the twentieth century. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1973. 535 p. (in Russian).

8. Verderevskaya N. A. Russian novel 40–60-ies of the nineteenth century. Typology of genre forms. Kazan, Kazan University Press, 1980. 136 p. (in Russian).

9. Leites N. S. Romance as an art system. Perm, Perm State the University, 1985. 79 p. (in Russian).

10. Kaiser W. Entstehung und Krise des modernen Romans [Emergence and crisis of the modern novel]. Stuttgart, Athenaum, 1954. 36 p. (in German).

11. Lämmert E. Bauformen des Erzählens [Designs of narration]. Stuttgart, J. B. Metzler, 1955. 296 p. (in German).

12. Stanzel F. K. Typische Formen des Romans [Typical forms of the novel]. Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1964. 77 p. (in German).


Review

Views: 686


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2524-2369 (Print)
ISSN 2524-2377 (Online)