Consumption: conceptualization of notion in foreign classical sociology
https://doi.org/10.29235/2524-2369-2021-66-2-153-162
Abstract
Bases for the concept of “consumption” in foreign classical sociology have been considered. The author’s theoretical scheme of consumption analysis is developed. Approaches to consumption within the framework of structural functionalism at the level of macrosocial analysis are presented – these are class and institutional approaches, based on the principle of social organization and subordination. Social functions of the consumption are the stratification and establishment of control by interested system players. On the level of microsocial analysis, there is a socio-cultural approach based on the principle of identification, and in this case, social functions of consumption are the rationality of subjects in the process of self-realization and establishment of social communications in the context of the value-normative system of culture. As a result of the review of the scientific literature, it has been revealed that, at the moment, there is no consensus among researchers on the adoption of a broad definition of the concept of “consumption” in sociology, since it is usually defined by the context of the study. Based on the analysis of the sociological approaches to the consumption, its definition is formulated as social activity to satisfy material and spiritual needs through acquiring, using, destroying and alienating goods, as a result of which social differences and relations, social structure, institutional influence, value-normative system of culture, social identity, life styles, social connections and communications are determined, established and maintained.
About the Author
A. V. SiamionavaBelarus
Aliaksandra V. Siamionava, Postgraduate Student, Junior Researcher
1 Surganov Str., Bldg 2, Minsk
References
1. Ovrutskii А. V. Sociology of consumption: the main research areas. Nauka o cheloveke: gumanitarnye issledovaniya = The Science of Person: Humanitarian Researches, 2010, no. 5, pp. 160–167 (in Russian).
2. Veblen T. The theory of the leisure class. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1984, 367 p. (in Russian).
3. Simmel G. Favorite. Vol. 2. Contemplation of life. Moscow, Yurist Publ., 1996. 607 p. (in Russian).
4. Bourdieu P. Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya = Journal of Economic Sociology, 2005, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 25–49 (in Russian).
5. Blue S. The sociology of consumption. The Cambridge handbook of sociology. Vol. 2. Specialty and interdisciplinary studies. Cambridge, 2017, pp. 265–274.
6. Horkheimer M., Adorno T. W. Dialectic of enlightenment: philosophical fragments. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2002. 282 p.
7. Marcuse H. One-dimensional men. Moscow, AST, Ermak Publ., 2003. 331 p. (in Russian).
8. Baudrillard J. System of things. Moscow, Rudomino Publ., 2001. 218 p. (in Russian).
9. Baudrillard J. Consumer society: its myths and structures. London, Sage Publications, 1998. 221 p. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526401502
10. Izberk-Bilgin E. An interdisciplinary review of resistance to consumption, some marketing interpretations, and future research suggestions. Consumption Markets & Culture, 2010, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253861003787031
11. Bauman Z. Globalization. The human consequences. Cambridge, Polity Press, 1998. 136 p.
12. Bauman Z. The individualized society. Cambridge, Polity Press, 2001. 272 p.
13. Douglas M., Isherwood B. C. The world of gods: towards an anthropology of consumption. London, Routledge, 1996. 169 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203434857p.
14. Sassatelli R. Consumer culture: history, theory and politics. London, Sage Publications Ltd, 2007. 249 p. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446212684
15. De Certeau M. The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1984. 229 p.
16. Miller D. Material culture and mass consumption. Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1987. 240 p.
17. Mayr C. Implication of the symbolic interactionist perspective for the study of taboo consumption. IfS Discussion Paper, no. 5. Klagenfurt, Alpen-Adria-Universitat, 2018. 21 p.



















