Archetypes of images of nonlinear architecture: randomness or conscious assimilation
https://doi.org/10.29235/2524-2369-2022-67-2-217-224
Abstract
For the first time in art history the problem of the appeal of architects of the digital era to the reconstruction of images of objects of the organic world through nonlinear shaping is raised. The aim of the research is to establish the archetypal nature of the images of nonlinear architecture through the essence of the phenomenon of sporadicity and conscious choice. It is revealed on the basis of the author’s artistic and figurative concept, which represents architecture as a symbiosis of phenomenological, procedural (evolutionary) and reproduced existences. The methodological basis is provided by the scientific works of scientists in the field of art and architecture (F. Johnson, A. Vidler, P. Schumacher, I. Dobritsyna, I. Azizyan, E. Lapshina, E. Sokolova, A. Shamruk). Through the prism of retrospection and comparative analysis, the architects aspirations to imitate the objects of the surrounding reality in the forms and structures of structures are revealed. The author substantiates the premeditation and randomness in the modeling of images of nonlinear architecture as a result of synthetic architecture. It is concluded that in appealing to the prototypes of real reality, the architect of the digital age acted as the creator of the beautiful, designed in the image and likeness of nature.
About the Author
Yu. Yu. Zakharyna
Belarusian State Pedagogical University named after Maxim Tank
Belarus
Belarus
Yuliya Y. Zakharyna – D. Sc. (Art.), Аssociate Professor, Нead of the Department, Belarusian State Pedagogical University named after Maxim Tank.
18 Sovetskaya Str., 220030 Minsk.
References
1. Johnson P., Wigley M. Deconstructivist architecture. New York, The Museum of Modern Art, 1988. 104 p.
2. Vidler A. The architectural Uncanny : essays in the Modern Unhomely. Cambridge, MIT Press, 1992. 257 p.
3. Schumacher P. Parametricism: a new global style for architecture and urban design. Architectural Design, 2009, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.912
4. Dobritsyna I. A. Nonlinear paradigm in architecture of the 90s of the XX century. Voprosy teorii arkhitektury. Arkhitekturnoe soznanie XX–XXI vekov: razlomy i perekhody: sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Questions of the theory of architecture. Architectural consciousness of the XX–XXI centuries: faults and transitions: collection of scientific papers]. Moscow, 2001, pp. 146–206 (in Russian).
5. Dobritsyna I. A. From Postmodernism to non-linear architecture: architecture in the context of modern philosophy and science. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2004. 413 p. (in Russian).
6. Azizyan I. A., Dobritsyna I. A., Lebedeva G. S. Theory of composition as poetics of architecture. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2002. 476, [35] p. (in Russian).
7. Lapshina E. A., Likhanskii A. Yu. Neotectonics in the images of modern architecture. Vestnik Inzhenernoi shkoly Dal’nevostochnogo federal’nogo universiteta = The Far Eastern Federal University: School of Engineering Bulletin, 2016, no. 2 (27), pp. 79–90 (in Russian).
8. Sokolova E. M. Digital architecture as a metaphor for the human body. Available at: http://www.cvetoplastika.org.ru/home/nasi-stati/digitalnaa-arhitektura-kak-metafora-celoveceskogo-organizma (accessed 12.04.2018) (in Russian).
9. Shamruk A. S. Tradition in the design strategies of modern architecture. Minsk, Belaruskaya navuka Publ., 2014. 297 p. (in Russian).
Review
Views: 419
Email this article 