Godonyms of the city of Grodno (Belarus) and the city of Termez (Uzbekistan): principles of nomination
https://doi.org/10.29235/2524-2369-2023-68-1-24-34
Abstract
The article discusses the basic principles of the nomination of the streets of the cities of Grodno and Termez, due to a number of sociolinguistic, linguocultural, historical-cultural, political-ideological and socio-economic factors. On the basis of a quantitative percentage ratio, productive and unproductive types and subtypes of godonyms of each of the cities are determined, common features and national peculiarities in the system of Grodno and Termez godonymy are revealed.
Keywords
About the Author
T. N. OdinaevBelarus
Timur N. Odinaev – Postgraduate student
1 Surganov Str., Bldg 2, Minsk 220072
References
1. Leonovich O. A. Essays on Eng. lang. onomastics: a manual for teachers. Moscow, Interpraks Publ., 1994. 128 p. (in Russian).
2. Li Van. Russian lang urbanonyms of Belarus in comparison with Chinese: structure, nomination. Vitebsk, Vitebsk State University, 2010. 179 p. (in Russian).
3. Mezenko A. M. Urbanonymy of Belarus. Minsk, Universitetskoe Publ., 1991. 167 p. (in Russian).
4. Sayapin V. Yu. 50 Grodno streets. A walk in time. Grodno, YurSaPrint Publ., 2016. 326 p. (in Russian)
5. National encyclopedia of Uzbekistan. Vol. 8. Tashkent, State Scientific Publishing House, 2004. 779 p. (in Uzbek).
6. Jo’rayev U. T. Stories from history. Tashkent, Chulpan Publishing and printing creative house, 2015. 184 p. (in Uzbek).
7. Tursunov S. N., Pardaev T. R. Surkhandarya is an ethnographic region. Termez, Termez State University, 2011. 450 p. (in Uzbek).



















